Skip
to main content

Reject the
Herd

Forums

Blogs

Gallery

Recent Posts

Formating Guide

Terms of
Use

Home » Forums » Big Brother » Ministry of
Truth

Washington State Has A Fraudulent Constitution

Login
or register
to post comments

5 replies [Last
post]

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 4:03pm

Mysandrist Fool

Offline

Thought Criminal

Joined: Sep 20 2008

Posts:

Here: - http://www.crtf.org/home.html

The Washington State Constitutional Fraud

This one is interesting. I knew the guys who dug all this up (good grief,
it's
already been over ten years ago it started). It isn't the ones below,
who
are/were taking the credit for the hard work of others.  However,
they may have
contributed, which included a trip back to the District of
Criminals and a LOT
of financial investment on several individuals'
parts.

The Secretary of
State started refusing to, any longer, certify the
Washington Constitution,
because of the probability it was not properly
ratified.  During the
Bicentennial, the State's site stated "there are
two
constitutions."

Within the last decade, you could look at the original
constitution and
actually handle it, but they have since figured out it needed
better
protection.

HomeIntroduction
The
Fraud
1878
WA Constitution
Declaratory
Judgment
Ultimate
User
Holodeck
Law
TIBA
Product List
TIBA Product
Order Form
CENTER
FOR BUSINESS AND ESTATE PLANNING
Seminar
Schedule
Links

email

The Washington State
Constitutional Fraud

For over 111 years, it had been barely known that
there are
actually two Constitutions in the history of the State of
Washington. The first
was ratified [1] by the people of the Territory of Washington
on
November 5th in 1878 [2] This constitution was properly signed and promptly entered
into the public record. On January
28th, 1889, the 1878 constitution
was presented to the United States Senate for
inclusion into the union
and printed
in the federal register.

There was about a 10 year span between when the
1878
Constitution was presented to the Federal government for joining
the union and
when it was actually accepted into the union in February
22nd, 1889 [3] This delay was caused by a
democratically
controlled congress that didn't want republican states like
Washington
in the union.

A strange thing happend on the way to
acceptance
however.
On January 24th, 1889, more than 10
years after the first
constitution was presented to the union and
printed for approval, a Mr. H. C.
Wilmarth of the committee for the
Admission to the United
States wrote to
the Washington Territorial Governor, Eugene
Semple, urgently requesting that he
call for a constitutional
convention to create another state
constitution. This was done
because there wasn't time to have the legislature
call for one because
they wouldn't be lawfully meeting again until
after congress
would have passed the enabling act. Mr. Wilmarth was
desperately trying
to meet a timetable.

Newspaper articles and correspondence of the day
show
discussions between Mr. Metcalf, the Attorney General, and Mr.
Semple, the
Governor concerning whether or not the Governor could
lawfully call a
constitutional convention by executive proclimation.
Mr. Metcalf argued that
this clearly could not be done because the
executive doesn't represent the
people and thus cannot have this power.

Nevertheless, Mr. Wilmarth and friends had their
convention.
It began, conveniently on the centenial of the United
States Constitution, July
4, 1889 in Olympia, Washington despite the
fact that it was never lawfully
called for.

On that very same night, July 4, 1889, a huge fire
in
Ellensburgh wiped out the heart of the city. Ellensburgh was the
site of the
Statehood convention on January 3rd, 1889 where anxious
delegates gave authority
to Mr. Voorhees to get Washington accepted
under the 1878 constitution. Now that
a Republican President, Benjaman
Harrison, had been elected, it seemed everyone
was ready to get the
ball rolling again.

In March of 1888, Walla Walla had a similar fire.
Walla
Walla was the site of the original constitution and was the place
where many of
the records about that constitution were stored. On June
4th, 1889, Seattle had
another similar fire. In all these
fires, critical historical records
were destroyed. In all
these fires, mysterious things happened, such as
the failure of
critical water systems, making it impossible to save the public
records
of the day. By August 22nd, 1889, the second constitution was
completed
in Olympia.

Finally, 11 years after the second convention was
completed,
the 1889 constitution was filed into the public record
around 1900,
illegally substituted for the previous
constitution. There was never
any record of this constitution
being ratified by an election of the people. The
filed Journal of the
1889 convention copy shows all 75 of the signatures were
written in the same
handwriting!

At the state archives you can find another
original
of the 1889 constitution writtin in a
completely different hand bound in
folios with a blank second page
of a 2 page folio bound between the final page
of the constitution and
the signature page which begins a separate 4 page folio!

Finally, in 1957, the RCW created a volume 0 and
published
the 1889 constitution
and this has been used as the
official constitution of the
state ever since.

So...
Not only has a fraudulant
constitution been
passed off as the real one, but the two constitutions
differ in some significant
ways. The older one guaranteed allodial land
title to its inhabitants. That
means that it prohibited property taxes
and other leins on our property. It also
prohibited any person, or
association of persons, from occupying more that one
branch of the
government at the same time. These key protections for the people
are
not in the 1889 constitution. Both constitutions are quite similar in
most
respects but the order of the 1889 one is completely different
than the 1878
one. It is as if some minor fixes were wanted but not
in a way that anyone
would notice.

Discovery
Earlier this year (2000)
legal scholars
learned of these little known facts and are continuing
to investigate the
matter. Mr. David Carrol Stephenson, and Mr. Kenneth
Wayne, both recognized
international lawyers, began to take steps to
correct this problem.

Action
On September 18th, 2000,
Mr. David Carroll
Stephenson of American Business Law Inc. published
all the evidence known at
that time publicly in the Olympian
newspaper and sent legal proof [4] and an affidavit [4] packet to all high ranking state
government
officials and many state agencies asking for any information
they might have
that would controvert the published evidence. All
responses received were
negative. No one seemed to have any evidence
that might prove that the 1889 was
a legitimate constitution or that
the 1878 one was not the lawful Constitution
of the State of
Washington, and the only on eon file in Washington D.C.,
granting
Washington Statehood.

Reaction
Mr. Stephenson was then
placed in jail
for the crime of being a danger to the State of
Washington. This appears to have
been an attempt to prevent Mr.
Stephenson from carrying out legal action against
the State to force
correction of this problem.

Counter Action
Mr. Wayne, however,
was not
incarcerated and proceeded to file a lawsuit
against the
state for $380 Billion in damages on November 7th, 2000.

Related Action
During the election
crisis, Mr.
Wayne saw an opportunity to bring the Washington State
constitutional issue to
the attention of the Supreme Court of the United
States by issuing an Amicus
Motion and
Brief pointing out
some obvious constitutional issues
that should clear up the election
problems.

Actions to come
The ball is
rolling. Who knows
what effect these actions will have. The commercial
lein should begin to be felt
in the state early in 2001. Mr. Stephenson
and Mr. Wayne are giving the state an
ultimatum. They are determined to
get this straightened out and to put We
the People back in
charge of our government.

What will you do to
help?

Notes:

The 1878 ratification election results can be found on file at
the
Washington State Archives. back

The convention for the creation of this constitution was completed on
August
3rd, 1878 in Walla Walla, Washington and the federal
congressional record
recognizes the delegates to this convention by
name. See the p. 644, of the
April 12, 1879 issue of the Congressional
Record. back

See Volume 0 of the RCW, p. 19 (1992 Ed.) where you will find a copy
of the
enabling act that congress passed to admit Washington to the
union. back

This is in PDF format. Click here to
download a
reader. back

Top

Login
or register
to post comments

Tags:

Ministry of Truth

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 4:54pm
#1

Pagan

Offline

Site Admin

Joined: Aug 22 2008

Posts:

Re: Washington State Has A Fraudulent Constitution

Interesting, but
when has the "rule of law" or the "Constitution" ever been considered when the
assholes in government decide to do something?

I'm
going to look at this when I have some time, what is interesting at the Federal
level is this.  The income tax amendment was never ratified by a 2/3
majority and the Supreme Court to this day refused to even look at the
case.  That and did you know there is no law in existence that states one
has to file a 1040?

__________________

The Prince does not dismiss morality, instead, it politically defines
“Morality"
-- Niccolò Machiavelli

Top

Login
or register
to post comments

Mon, 01/11/2010 - 5:21pm
#2

Mysandrist Fool

Offline

Thought Criminal

Joined: Sep 20 2008

Posts:

Re: Washington State Has A Fraudulent Constitution

That's exactly why they act the way that they do. Do you know that less than
half of the judges in Washington State have actually been sworn in?

True fact. We've done many PDR's (Public Disclosure Requests) regarding
this.

Top

Login
or register
to post comments

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 12:09pm
#3

AstuteObserver

Offline

Thought Criminal

Joined: Feb 21 2009

Posts:

Re: Washington State Has A Fraudulent Constitution

It is all a fraud!  As long as people
accept "control by fear" as legitimate policy/law then it shall all remain a
fraud.

__________________

“It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he already knows”. -
EPICTETUS

Top

Login
or register
to post comments

Sat, 01/23/2010 - 4:14pm
#4

Big Brother

Offline

Newb

Joined: Sep 24 2008

Posts:

Re: Washington State Has A Fraudulent Constitution

The historical report is quite interesting. Seems
Washington as a state is a fraud, and all it's built on, leaving you with a de
facto rather than bona fide government.  It's definite behavior of the herd
to just obey authority figures without question.  If I lived in that state
I'd be way concerned about the lack of validity of any official state act
ever.

Too bad even if it got to the high courts in
Olympia it would be white washed and somehow validated.

By the way, I've seen both Stephenson's and Wayne's work,
particularly their authorities on administrative and commercial lien
processes.  Quite bogus.

__________________

Winston - "I hate purity. I hate goodness. I don't want any virtue to exist
anywhere. I want everyone to be corrupt to the bones."
Julia - "Well then, I
ought to suit you, dear. I'm corrupt to the bones." -- "1984" Part II Chapter
2

Top

Login
or register
to post comments

Mon, 01/25/2010 - 6:06pm
#5

Mysandrist Fool

Offline

Thought Criminal

Joined: Sep 20 2008

Posts:

Re: Washington State Has A Fraudulent Constitution

MANY of Washington State's judges have yet to be sworn in. It's a little
known FACT, and one question they don't like to be asked.

Top

Login
or register
to post comments